Before March 2020, the idea of a forensic accountant delivering expert witness testimony from a home office over Zoom would have seemed far fetched in most U.S. courtrooms. Fast forward to 2026, and remote expert witness testimony has become a recognized and increasingly debated feature of the legal landscape. If you’re involved in fraud litigation, […]

A seasoned white collar defense attorney once observed that the purpose of cross examining an opposing fraud expert witness is not to disprove their conclusions it is to make the jury distrust them. That distinction matters enormously, because it shapes the entire strategic logic of expert witness cross examination in fraud trials. The DOJ Fraud […]

Ask most attorneys when they bring in a fraud expert witness and the answer is almost always the same: when they start thinking about trial. Ask the same attorneys what mistakes they’ve made in litigation and a surprisingly large number will identify that answer as one of them. Late expert engagement is one of the […]

Organizations facing fraud litigation routinely conflate two professional roles that are related but fundamentally distinct: the forensic accountant and the expert witness. The confusion is understandable a forensic accountant frequently serves as an expert witness, and expert witnesses in fraud cases often have forensic accounting backgrounds. But treating the two roles as interchangeable creates strategic […]

Here is the question most attorneys and organizations miss when preparing fraud litigation: the judge and the jury evaluate expert witness credibility in completely different ways, using completely different criteria, and both evaluations can independently determine case outcome. The judge’s evaluation governed by Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and the Daubert standard focuses on whether […]

The decision to retain a forensic accounting expert witness is one of the most consequential choices an attorney makes in complex financial fraud litigation. The right expert transforms thousands of pages of financial records into a coherent narrative of wrongdoing or its absence. The wrong one hands opposing counsel their strongest cross examination material and, […]

In 2016, the first trial of pharmaceutical executive Martin Shkreli ended in acquittal on five of eight counts despite overwhelming documentary evidence of securities fraud. Jurors later confirmed that their decision turned significantly on their inability to follow the prosecution’s financial evidence without sufficient expert translation. The prosecution had the documents. They had the transactions. […]

A business owner discovers that a trusted financial controller embezzled more than $800,000 over three years. The bank records are clear. The wire transfers are documented. The signatures are on the approvals. The owner is certain it will be an open and shut case. But in court, opposing counsel armed with their own financial analyst […]

In 2025, a federal judge reversed a $4.7 billion jury verdict in the NFL Sunday Ticket antitrust case not because the facts were wrong, but because the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses had methodological flaws that opposing counsel exposed on cross examination. The jury had already decided. The damage was done. And then the verdict was thrown […]

Fraud cases are won and lost on complexity. The jurors evaluating a sophisticated embezzlement scheme, a healthcare billing fraud ring, or a multi million dollar Ponzi operation are rarely accountants or financial analysts. They are ordinary people being asked to understand extraordinary financial manipulation often buried in thousands of pages of transaction records, billing codes, […]